The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises
No. 972378Supreme Court of Virginia
972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use parol evidence to explain a purported ambiguity in a contract, and the judgment is…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use pa…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 18, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use parol evidence to explain a purported ambiguity in a contract, and the judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links