The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Horton v. Commonwealth
971645 Horton v. Commonwealth 04/17/1998 Because the evidence in these two cases proved that the defendants each penetrated the outer portion of the respective victim's genitalia, convictions are affirmed for …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
971645 Horton v. Commonwealth 04/17/1998 Because the evidence in these two cases proved that the defendants each penetrated the o…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 17, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
971645 Horton v. Commonwealth 04/17/1998 Because the evidence in these two cases proved that the defendants each penetrated the outer portion of the respective victim's genitalia, convictions are affirmed for forcible sodomy by engaging in cunnilingus in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1.
Open court document ↗