The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Cardinal Development Co. v. Stanley Constr. Co.
No. 971001Supreme Court of Virginia
971001 Cardinal Development Co. v. Stanley Constr. Co. 02/27/1998 In an action for breach of a construction contract, the developer's agreement to pay for additional work along with the construction company's …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
971001 Cardinal Development Co. v. Stanley Constr. Co. 02/27/1998 In an action for breach of a construction contract, the develop…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 27, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
971001 Cardinal Development Co. v. Stanley Constr. Co. 02/27/1998 In an action for breach of a construction contract, the developer's agreement to pay for additional work along with the construction company's actual performance of that work constitutes valuable consideration sufficient to modify the original contract. It cannot be said that the trial court's award of damages to the construction company is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it, and its judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links