The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Stickley v. Stickley
971244 Stickley v. Stickley 02/27/1998 Because a will which directs all estate taxes and administration expenses to be paid out of the residuary estate treated all debts, costs and expenses in the same manner,…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
971244 Stickley v. Stickley 02/27/1998 Because a will which directs all estate taxes and administration expenses to be paid out o…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 27, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
971244 Stickley v. Stickley 02/27/1998 Because a will which directs all estate taxes and administration expenses to be paid out of the residuary estate treated all debts, costs and expenses in the same manner, estate taxes should not be apportioned upon depletion of the residuary estate but should be changed generally against the probate estate. The testator satisfied the requirements of the anti-apportionment statute and the judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗