The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Ward's Equipment v. New Holland North America
No. 962544Supreme Court of Virginia
962544 Ward's Equipment v. New Holland North America 10/31/1997 In this controversy arising from a written contract between a manufacturer and a dealer in farm equipment, the trial court correctly held that a …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
962544 Ward's Equipment v. New Holland North America 10/31/1997 In this controversy arising from a written contract between a man…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Oct 31, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
962544 Ward's Equipment v. New Holland North America 10/31/1997 In this controversy arising from a written contract between a manufacturer and a dealer in farm equipment, the trial court correctly held that a party suing for damages may not allege facts that essentially reform the contract and thereby withstand demurrer.
Open court document ↗Documents and links