The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Parker v. Commonwealth
No. 961582Supreme Court of Virginia
961582 Parker v. Commonwealth 06/06/1997 In this grand larceny prosecution, since the Commonwealth did not prove the value of the item stolen, the evidence was inadequate as a matter of law to establish the el…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961582 Parker v. Commonwealth 06/06/1997 In this grand larceny prosecution, since the Commonwealth did not prove the value of the…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 6, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
961582 Parker v. Commonwealth 06/06/1997 In this grand larceny prosecution, since the Commonwealth did not prove the value of the item stolen, the evidence was inadequate as a matter of law to establish the element of value beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the judgment of conviction is vacated. The case is remanded for a new trial on the charge of petit larceny.
Open court document ↗Documents and links