The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Board of Sup. of Prince William County v. Omni Hom
No. 960508Supreme Court of Virginia
960508 Board of Sup. of Prince William County v. Omni Hom 01/10/1997 Since the plaintiff developers had not acquired the rights necessary to realize their preferred method of development either by contract or …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
960508 Board of Sup. of Prince William County v. Omni Hom 01/10/1997 Since the plaintiff developers had not acquired the rights n…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 10, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
960508 Board of Sup. of Prince William County v. Omni Hom 01/10/1997 Since the plaintiff developers had not acquired the rights necessary to realize their preferred method of development either by contract or easement, the action of a county in purchasing a neighboring tract could not damage a non-existent right and the purchase did not damage or take the plaintiffs' property as an uncompensated taking under either the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution or Article I, § 11 of the Constitution
Open court document ↗Documents and links