The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Yeskolski v. Crosby
No. 961005Supreme Court of Virginia
961005 Yeskolski v. Crosby 01/10/1997 In this action to quiet title to real property, the possessor of a deed of trust note was not a holder in due course of that note. The chancellor erred in failing to uphol…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961005 Yeskolski v. Crosby 01/10/1997 In this action to quiet title to real property, the possessor of a deed of trust note was n…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 10, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
961005 Yeskolski v. Crosby 01/10/1997 In this action to quiet title to real property, the possessor of a deed of trust note was not a holder in due course of that note. The chancellor erred in failing to uphold the commissioner's finding that a second deed of trust note had been paid in full before the possessor acquired it. The judgment entered below is reversed and vacated and final judgment is entered declaring that the second deed of trust is
Open court document ↗Documents and links