The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Monticello Insurance Co. v. Baecher
No. 960193Supreme Court of Virginia
960193 Monticello Insurance Co. v. Baecher 11/01/1996 Under the circumstances of this case involving lead paint, the trial court erred in concluding that the health hazard exclusion clause in an insurance poli…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
960193 Monticello Insurance Co. v. Baecher 11/01/1996 Under the circumstances of this case involving lead paint, the trial court …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 1, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
960193 Monticello Insurance Co. v. Baecher 11/01/1996 Under the circumstances of this case involving lead paint, the trial court erred in concluding that the health hazard exclusion clause in an insurance policy was not enforceable. That judgment is reversed and a judgment is entered declaring that the insurer has no duty to defend and/or indemnify a landlord against the claims of tenants.
Open court document ↗Documents and links