The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
VEPCO v. Northbrook Prop. and Cas. Ins.
No. 951919Supreme Court of Virginia
951919 VEPCO v. Northbrook Prop. and Cas. Ins. 09/13/1996 Given the plain and generally accepted meaning of the term "employee," the trial court erred in determining that the employee exclusion of an insurance…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
951919 VEPCO v. Northbrook Prop. and Cas. Ins. 09/13/1996 Given the plain and generally accepted meaning of the term "employee," …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 13, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
951919 VEPCO v. Northbrook Prop. and Cas. Ins. 09/13/1996 Given the plain and generally accepted meaning of the term "employee," the trial court erred in determining that the employee exclusion of an insurance policy permitted the insurer to refuse to fulfill its obligation to defend the insured from a personal injury lawsuit. That judgment is reversed and judgment is entered for the insured. The case is remanded for determination of damages.
Open court document ↗Documents and links