The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Woodward v. Morgan
No. 952041Supreme Court of Virginia
952041 Woodward v. Morgan 09/13/1996 Since construction of a residence on a particular lot would violate the applicable restrictive covenants for a residential subdivision, the final decree of the trial court …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
952041 Woodward v. Morgan 09/13/1996 Since construction of a residence on a particular lot would violate the applicable restricti…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 13, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
952041 Woodward v. Morgan 09/13/1996 Since construction of a residence on a particular lot would violate the applicable restrictive covenants for a residential subdivision, the final decree of the trial court is plainly wrong and contrary to law. The cause is remanded to the trial court for entry, if necessary, of an appropriate injunction to enforce this judgment.
Open court document ↗Documents and links