The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Hutter v. Heilmann
No. 952047Supreme Court of Virginia
952047 Hutter v. Heilmann 09/13/1996 An indemnification provision in a contract between the parties requires the defendants, who own all of the stock in a company, to indemnify the plaintiffs for the entire am…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
952047 Hutter v. Heilmann 09/13/1996 An indemnification provision in a contract between the parties requires the defendants, who …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 13, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
952047 Hutter v. Heilmann 09/13/1996 An indemnification provision in a contract between the parties requires the defendants, who own all of the stock in a company, to indemnify the plaintiffs for the entire amount they paid a bank on a loan to the company which they earlier had personally guaranteed. The trial court judgment that the defendants were not liable is reversed and judgment entered awarding plaintiffs damages.
Open court document ↗Documents and links