The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Price v. Taylor
No. 950802Supreme Court of Virginia
950802 Price v. Taylor 01/12/1996 While the trial court ruling that there was consideration for a contract for the sale of land was not erroneous, excluding certain jury instructions on fraud in the procuremen…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950802 Price v. Taylor 01/12/1996 While the trial court ruling that there was consideration for a contract for the sale of land w…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 12, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
950802 Price v. Taylor 01/12/1996 While the trial court ruling that there was consideration for a contract for the sale of land was not erroneous, excluding certain jury instructions on fraud in the procurement of the contract and admitting certain expert testimony and prohibiting evidence that the contract was subject to a condition precedent was error. The judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded for a new trial.
Open court document ↗Documents and links