The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins.
No. 951117Supreme Court of Virginia
951117 Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins. 01/12/1996 A certified question: "Whether [an insurer] may deny UM coverage to [the insured] on the grounds that [the insured] settled with [another insurer] without …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
951117 Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins. 01/12/1996 A certified question: "Whether [an insurer] may deny UM coverage to [the in…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 12, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
951117 Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins. 01/12/1996 A certified question: "Whether [an insurer] may deny UM coverage to [the insured] on the grounds that [the insured] settled with [another insurer] without [the insurer's] consent, when [the insurer's] UM contract contained a consent-to-settlement clause but [the insurer] was not prejudiced by the settlement," is answered in the affirmative.
Open court document ↗Documents and links