The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Franconia Associates v. Clark
No. 942034Supreme Court of Virginia
942034 Franconia Associates v. Clark 11/03/1995 The trial court correctly held that the plaintiff did not exceed the scope of his status as an invitee in a shopping mall when he pursued a fleeing robber, and, …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
942034 Franconia Associates v. Clark 11/03/1995 The trial court correctly held that the plaintiff did not exceed the scope of his…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 3, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
942034 Franconia Associates v. Clark 11/03/1995 The trial court correctly held that the plaintiff did not exceed the scope of his status as an invitee in a shopping mall when he pursued a fleeing robber, and, furthermore, he was not injured by chasing the robber, but rather by the defective condition of defendants' door. There was also ample evidence to support the jury's finding that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence and that finding will not be disturbed on appeal.
Open court document ↗Documents and links