The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Harris v. DiMattina
No. 941410Supreme Court of Virginia
941410 Harris v. DiMattina 09/15/1995 In two appeals of medical malpractice actions the question is whether the trial courts erred in sustaining pleas of the statute of limitations. Judgments in favor of healt…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
941410 Harris v. DiMattina 09/15/1995 In two appeals of medical malpractice actions the question is whether the trial courts erre…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 15, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
941410 Harris v. DiMattina 09/15/1995 In two appeals of medical malpractice actions the question is whether the trial courts erred in sustaining pleas of the statute of limitations. Judgments in favor of health care providers are affirmed in one case and reversed in another case, applying the 1993 amendment to Code § 8.01-581.2, which eliminated the notice of claim requirement, and giving effect to the repeal of former Code § 8.01- 581.9 on the particular facts of each case.
Open court document ↗Documents and links