The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Bogese Inc. v. State Highway Comm'r
No. 941856Supreme Court of Virginia
941856 Bogese Inc. v. State Highway Comm'r 09/15/1995 In an eminent domain case the trial court correctly held that, because two tracts of land were owned by different entities at the time of condemnation for …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
941856 Bogese Inc. v. State Highway Comm'r 09/15/1995 In an eminent domain case the trial court correctly held that, because two …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 15, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
941856 Bogese Inc. v. State Highway Comm'r 09/15/1995 In an eminent domain case the trial court correctly held that, because two tracts of land were owned by different entities at the time of condemnation for a highway project, unity of ownership did not exist and, thus, the unity of lands doctrine is not satisfied. The trial court's judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links