The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Reed v. Liverman
No. 941420Supreme Court of Virginia
941420 Reed v. Liverman 06/09/1995 The trial court erred in concluding that an order terminating a prior action with prejudice was not res judicata as to this subsequent action on the same promissory note, and…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
941420 Reed v. Liverman 06/09/1995 The trial court erred in concluding that an order terminating a prior action with prejudice wa…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 9, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
941420 Reed v. Liverman 06/09/1995 The trial court erred in concluding that an order terminating a prior action with prejudice was not res judicata as to this subsequent action on the same promissory note, and that judgment is reversed and final judgment granted.
Open court document ↗Documents and links