The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
McManama v. Plunk
No. 941440Supreme Court of Virginia
941440 McManama v. Plunk 06/09/1995 The defendant below had no justifiable expectation of a Rule 3:3 or statute of limitations defense under Virginia law that was entitled to protection under the due process c…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
941440 McManama v. Plunk 06/09/1995 The defendant below had no justifiable expectation of a Rule 3:3 or statute of limitations de…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 9, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
941440 McManama v. Plunk 06/09/1995 The defendant below had no justifiable expectation of a Rule 3:3 or statute of limitations defense under Virginia law that was entitled to protection under the due process clause of the Constitution and was not deprived of any other property interest, or prejudiced in any way, by the nonsuit and, consequently, the trial court erred in refusing to give limitations tolling effect as prescribed by statute to a prior order of nonsuit on the ground that its ex parte entry violated the constitutional guarantee of procedural due process and that ruling is reversed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links