Share the record

DENIED

Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER)

Choose a format

Current status: DENIED
As of: Apr 18, 2008
Source: SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA · DOCKET 070277 ↗

Why this status appears

Status is derived only from narrow phrases in the court’s verbatim disposition or latest docket entry.

070277 Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER) 04/18/2008 An appellant must present a sufficient record for an appellate court to determine whether a lower court has erred, including the basis of the challenged ruling. Where an appellant claimed that its motion under Code § 8.01-428(A) to set aside a default judgment was erroneously denied, but failed to include any transcript of the circuit court's hearing on that motion or a statement of facts relating to that hearing as required by Rule 5:1…

No caption or status can be supplied through the URL. The graphic reads the stored record identified by the link.