Share the record

FILED

Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins.

Choose a format

Current status: FILED
As of: Jan 12, 1996
Source: SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA · DOCKET 951117 ↗

Why this status appears

Status is derived only from narrow phrases in the court’s verbatim disposition or latest docket entry.

951117 Osborne v. National Union Fire Ins. 01/12/1996 A certified question: "Whether [an insurer] may deny UM coverage to [the insured] on the grounds that [the insured] settled with [another insurer] without [the insurer's] consent, when [the insurer's] UM contract contained a consent-to-settlement clause but [the insurer] was not prejudiced by the settlement," is answered in the affirmative.

The graphic is made from the official record the link points to. No caption or status can be added to the link.