Share the record

REVERSED

Harris v. DiMattina

Choose a format

Current status: REVERSED
As of: Sep 15, 1995
Source: SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA · DOCKET 941410 ↗

Why this status appears

Status is derived only from narrow phrases in the court’s verbatim disposition or latest docket entry.

941410 Harris v. DiMattina 09/15/1995 In two appeals of medical malpractice actions the question is whether the trial courts erred in sustaining pleas of the statute of limitations. Judgments in favor of health care providers are affirmed in one case and reversed in another case, applying the 1993 amendment to Code § 8.01-581.2, which eliminated the notice of claim requirement, and giving effect to the repeal of former Code § 8.01- 581.9 on the particular facts of each case.

The graphic is made from the official record the link points to. No caption or status can be added to the link.