Skip to page content
United States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative empty legislative chamber as neutral vote indicators resolve a recorded outcome
104th Congress · 1995–1997
S. 522

A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Ac…

Energy Senate 1 cosponsors
Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 97. · April 27, 1995
Understand the measure

What this bill does

No official summary is on file here yet. Check Congress.gov for available summaries and the bill text.

Check official summaries ↗

01
The measure

The official bill title and text published by Congress and GovInfo.

02
The movement

Every committee, chamber, and clerk-recorded action attached to its date.

03
The votes

Every roll call on this measure—or a clear notice when no individual vote exists.

Where it stands

The measure's progress

Out of committee

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 97.

Recorded April 27, 1995, as the clerk wrote it

Sponsor Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM]
Committee Energy and Natural Resources Committee
Official title A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico.
Recorded votes None taken
The official record
Cite this record
Reference number
bill-104-s522
Official source
Congress.gov ↗
Last checked
Status and actions last read from the official GovInfo BILLSTATUS record
AP style

Vote Files, "S. 522 (104th Congress): A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico," last checked Oct. 14, 2026, citing Congress.gov, https://votefiles.com/cite/bill-104-s522

APA

Vote Files. (2026, October 14). S. 522 (104th Congress): A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico [Bill record]. Retrieved October 15, 2026, from https://votefiles.com/cite/bill-104-s522

Chicago

Vote Files. "S. 522 (104th Congress): A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico." Last modified October 14, 2026. Accessed October 15, 2026. https://votefiles.com/cite/bill-104-s522.

BibTeX
@misc{votefiles_bill_104_s522,
  author       = {{Vote Files}},
  title        = {{S. 522 (104th Congress): A bill to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://votefiles.com/cite/bill-104-s522}},
  note         = {Reference number bill-104-s522; official source: Congress.gov, https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/522; last checked October 14, 2026; accessed October 15, 2026}
}
Plain link

https://votefiles.com/cite/bill-104-s522

Cite the official source for the underlying fact. The Vote Files reference number never changes for this record. AP, APA and Chicago are standard citation styles for news and academic writing, and BibTeX is the format reference-manager programs read.

Official analyses

CBO cost estimates and CRS reports on S. 522

No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.

Listed only where the Congressional Budget Office names this bill number in its estimate's title and that title matches the bill's own, or where the Congressional Research Service lists this bill among a report's related materials. Titles and dates are the publishers' own. All watchdog and scorekeeper reports

On the record

No recorded vote

No roll call has been taken on this measure, so no member's position on it is on the record. Most measures never get one.